NursingHomes.us
StatesRankingsCompare
NursingHomes.us

Independent nursing-home comparison using official CMS data. Not affiliated with the U.S. government.

Browse

  • All States
  • Rankings
  • Compare
  • Guides

Data

  • Nursing Home Chains
  • Inspection Codes
  • Data Sources

About

  • About Us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
© 2026 NursingHomes.us. All data from CMS.gov.
HomeCaliforniaCalifornia Home for the Aged

California Home for the Aged

6720 E. Kings Canyon, Fresno, CA 937275592518414WebsiteGoogle Maps
4.7on Google(48 reviews)
5/5Much Above Average
Accepts Medicare Accepts Medicaid Sprinkler System

CMS data snapshot: July 2026

Health
5/5
Staffing
5/5
Quality
4/5
Beds
120
certified

How California Home for the Aged Compares in California

Facility results compared with averages for CMS-certified nursing homes in California. Ratings, staffing and turnover measure different parts of care and should be reviewed together.

CMS overall rating
5/5
CA average
3.2/5
Above state average
Health inspection rating
5/5
CA average
2.8/5
Above state average
Staffing rating
5/5
CA average
3.3/5
Above state average
Nursing hours per resident
4.24 hrs/day
CA average
4.52 hrs/day
Below state average
RN hours per resident
0.71 hrs/day
CA average
0.67 hrs/day
Close to state average
Staff turnover
33.9%
CA average
36.7%
Close to state average

Comparisons use the matching CMS state averages without a proprietary combined score. Review the comparison methodology.

What the Data Highlights

Its 5/5 overall CMS rating is above the California average of 3.2/5.
Its 5/5 health inspection rating is above the California average of 2.8/5.
Reported nursing time is 4.24 hours per resident per day, below the state average of 4.52.

Health Inspection Trend

A side-by-side view of the two CMS inspection cycles included in the current dataset.

Previous cycle
18
deficiency citations
Inspected Mar 28, 2024
Most recent cycle
1
deficiency citation
Inspected Mar 20, 2025
The most recent cycle recorded 17 fewer deficiency citations than the previous cycle.

Citation counts alone do not show severity. Review the inspection details below for scope, severity and correction status.

Cost & Demographics

Semi-Private Room
$11,476/mo
California median
Private Room
$13,870/mo
California median
Fresno County 65+
125,708
12.5% of county
County Population
1,008,280
Fresno County

Cost data: Genworth/CareScout Cost of Care Survey (2024). Demographics: U.S. Census Bureau ACS (2022).

Swipe tabs for staffing, quality and ownership.

California Home for the Aged is a 5-star Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing home in Fresno, California with 120 certified beds. It has been operating since 1969. Its overall CMS rating is 5 out of 5.

Beds
120
Avg Residents/Day
98.9
Ownership
Non profit - Corporation
Provider Type
Medicare and Medicaid
In Hospital
No
First Approved
May 23, 1969
Sprinklers
Yes
Council
Resident
County
Fresno
Last Inspection
Mar 20, 2025
Deficiencies (Cycle 1)
1
Weighted Score
32.0
Infection Citations
0

Deficiency Citations (35)

F0689Actual Harm

Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.

Survey: Aug 19, 2025Corrected: NoCycle: 1
F0656Potential for Harm

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Survey: Mar 20, 2025Corrected: NoCycle: 1
F0658Potential for Harm

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Survey: Sep 4, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0584Potential for Harm

Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0656Potential for Harm

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0658Potential for Harm

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0759Potential for Harm

Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0761Potential for Harm

Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0800Potential for Harm

Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0803Potential for Harm

Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0812Potential for Harm

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0842Potential for Harm

Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0880Potential for Harm

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0943Potential for Harm

Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0550Potential for Harm

Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0641Potential for Harm

Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0645Potential for Harm

PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0726Potential for Harm

Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0755Potential for Harm

Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0921Potential for Harm

Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

Survey: Mar 28, 2024Corrected: NoCycle: 2
F0881Potential for Harm

Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0658Potential for Harm

Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0695Potential for Harm

Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0726Potential for Harm

Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0812Potential for Harm

Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0880Potential for Harm

Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0888Potential for Harm

Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0655Potential for Harm

Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0656Potential for Harm

Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3
F0690Potential for Harm

Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.

Survey: Apr 22, 2022Corrected: NoCycle: 3

+ 5 more deficiencies

Total Fines
$0
Number of Fines
0
Payment Denials
0
Total Penalties
0

No penalties on record.

Staffing hours per resident per day. The black line shows the national average.

Nurse Aide2.69 hrs
National avg: 2.32 hrs
LPN0.84 hrs
National avg: 0.86 hrs
RN0.71 hrs
National avg: 0.69 hrs
Total Nursing4.24 hrs
National avg: 3.86 hrs
Weekend Total4.02 hrs
National avg: 0.00 hrs
Physical Therapist0.11 hrs
National avg: 0.07 hrs
Total Turnover
33.9%
RN Turnover
33.3%
Administrators Left
0

Quality measures as percentages of residents. Lower is better for all measures.

Ownership Type
Non profit - Corporation
Recent Change
No

Owners & Managers (59)

NameRoleTypeOwnership %Since
OFFICE OF STATEWIDE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTOrganizationN/ANov 20, 2018
OFFICE OF STATEWIDE HEALTH PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTOrganizationN/ANov 20, 2018
BAGDASARIAN, MITCHCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
BRAA, MARYCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
BZNOUNI, VAHAGNCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
DER SIMONIAN, VAROUJANCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
GRAYSON, LUCYCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 11, 2018
HANNIGAN, MICHAELCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
HOKOKIAN, EDWARDCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
KRBOYAN, GARYCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
MANGASARIAN, ROBERTCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 11, 2018
SAMPLE, GEORGIACORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
SHAHBAZIAN, STEVENCORPORATE DIRECTORIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
BACOPULOS, DENNISCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
BAGDASARIAN, MITCHCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
BRAA, MARYCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
DER SIMONIAN, VAROUJANCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
GRAYSON, LUCYCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 11, 2018
HANNIGAN, MICHAELCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
HOKOKIAN, EDWARDCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
KRBOYAN, GARYCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
MANGASARIAN, ROBERTCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 11, 2018
SAMPLE, GEORGIACORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
SHAHBAZIAN, STEVENCORPORATE OFFICERIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
ANDERSEN, TERRYOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AMay 29, 2019
BACOPULOS, DENNISOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
BAGDASARIAN, MITCHOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
BRAA, MARYOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
BUWALDA, LORIOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AApr 14, 2025
BZNOUNI, VAHAGNOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
DER SIMONIAN, VAROUJANOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
GONZALES, MELANIEOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AJan 23, 2025
GRAYSON, LUCYOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 11, 2018
HANNIGAN, MICHAELOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
HARRIS, CHARLENEOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ADec 18, 2023
HOKOKIAN, EDWARDOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
HOPKINS, ANGELAOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AJun 1, 2022
KAUR SARAN, BARINDEROPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AJun 16, 2025
KRBOYAN, GARYOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2021
MANGASARIAN, ROBERTOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 11, 2018
NOLEN, NICKOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AMay 8, 2023
PAYNE, TRISTANOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AMay 11, 2022
SAMPLE, GEORGIAOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2022
SHAHBAZIAN, STEVENOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
SIDHU, ASHA PRITPALOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AApr 1, 2007
TELESMANIC, CHRISTOPHEROPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AJul 1, 2014
TOOR, RAJWINDOROPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLIndividualN/AJan 2, 2025
ANDERSEN, TERRYADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AMay 29, 2019
BACOPULOS, DENNISADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/ASep 1, 2023
BUWALDA, LORIADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AApr 14, 2025
GONZALES, MELANIEADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AJan 23, 2025
HARRIS, CHARLENEADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/ADec 18, 2023
HOPKINS, ANGELAADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AJun 1, 2022
KAUR SARAN, BARINDERADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AJun 16, 2025
NOLEN, NICKADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AMay 8, 2023
PAYNE, TRISTANADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AMay 11, 2022
SIDHU, ASHA PRITPALADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AApr 1, 2007
TELESMANIC, CHRISTOPHERADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AJul 1, 2014
TOOR, RAJWINDORADP OF THE SNFIndividualN/AJan 2, 2025

Compare Nearby Nursing Homes

Compare CMS ratings and recorded fines for California Home for the Aged and nearby alternatives.

All California facilities
California Home for the Aged
Fresno, CACurrent facility
CMS
5/5
Health
5/5
Staffing
5/5
Recorded fines: None
Pacific Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Fresno, CA2.8 mi
CMS
3/5
Health
2/5
Staffing
4/5
Recorded fines: $30,654
Evergreen Care Center
Fresno, CA2.8 mi
CMS
3/5
Health
3/5
Staffing
2/5
Recorded fines: None
Orchard Post Acute
Fresno, CA3.4 mi
CMS
3/5
Health
2/5
Staffing
3/5
Recorded fines: None
Stonehaven Senior Living
Fresno, CA3.4 mi
CMS
N/A
Health
N/A
Staffing
N/A
Recorded fines: None
Grace Healthcare Center
Fresno, CA4.0 mi
CMS
1/5
Health
1/5
Staffing
4/5
Recorded fines: $32,110
Sierra Vista Healthcare
Fresno, CA4.5 mi
CMS
3/5
Health
3/5
Staffing
4/5
Recorded fines: $12,048
FacilityDistanceCMSHealthStaffingRecorded fines
California Home for the Aged
Fresno, CA · Current facility
—5/55/55/5None recorded
Pacific Gardens Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
Fresno, CA
2.8 mi3/52/54/5$30,654
Evergreen Care Center
Fresno, CA
2.8 mi3/53/52/5None recorded
Orchard Post Acute
Fresno, CA
3.4 mi3/52/53/5None recorded
Stonehaven Senior Living
Fresno, CA
3.4 miN/AN/AN/ANone recorded
Grace Healthcare Center
Fresno, CA
4.0 mi1/51/54/5$32,110
Sierra Vista Healthcare
Fresno, CA
4.5 mi3/53/54/5$12,048

Distance is approximate. Ratings and enforcement data use the current CMS snapshot; recorded fines are not a complete measure of care quality. How nearby facilities are selected.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the CMS rating for California Home for the Aged?▾
California Home for the Aged has an overall CMS rating of 5 out of 5 stars, with a health inspection rating of 5/5, staffing rating of 5/5, and quality measures rating of 4/5. This facility is rated above average.
How much does California Home for the Aged cost per month?▾
While individual facility pricing is not publicly available, the median nursing home cost in California is $11,476/month for a semi-private room and $13,870/month for a private room (Genworth/CareScout 2024). California Home for the Aged participates in Medicare and Medicaid, which may cover some or all costs depending on eligibility.
Has California Home for the Aged had any health inspection violations?▾
California Home for the Aged had 1 deficiency citations in its most recent health inspection (Mar 20, 2025). The current CMS dataset records no fines for this facility.
What are the staffing levels at California Home for the Aged?▾
California Home for the Aged provides 4.24 total nursing staff hours per resident per day, including 0.71 RN hours, 0.84 LPN hours, and 2.69 nurse aide hours. The total staff turnover rate is 33.9%.
How many beds does California Home for the Aged have?▾
California Home for the Aged has 120 certified beds with an average of 98.9 residents per day, resulting in approximately 82% occupancy. The facility is Non profit - Corporation owned.
Are there other nursing homes near California Home for the Aged?▾
Yes. This page lists 6 nearby nursing homes in California, including 6 in Fresno. Compare their CMS ratings, staffing, inspections and fines before choosing a facility.
What do patients and families say about California Home for the Aged?▾
On Google Maps, California Home for the Aged has a rating of 4.7 out of 5 based on 48 reviews. This is an independent rating from visitors and families, separate from the official CMS government rating of 5/5.